Emerging Technologies Librarian

Entries categorized as ‘Enterprise’

Social Media Policies & Issues – Two New Resources

December 19, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Last August I worked on the Enterprise Social Media series, which continues more slowly, and recently I’ve been working largely on the FDASM series about new policy guideline development there. I recently stumbled on a couple resources I wanted to share with you here, and which relate to both of these main topics.

The Social Media Governance site has a LOT of things relevant to the whole Enterprise 2.0 topic. Worth exploring in general, but if you are doing either implementation or administration of any social media initiative, you MUST check out the Policy Database. This collects social media policies and guidelines from various organizations, and groups them by type of industry. Absolutely essential reading. The Healthcare section (shown here) has a collection of types of social media guidelines already being used in different places, from clinical environments to academia to insurance to pharma. It absolutely should be reviewed by anyone involved in the FDASM process.

Cool Toys pics of the day: Social Media Governance: Policy Database
Social Media Governance: Policy Database: http://socialmediagovernance. com/policies.php?f=4

On a related note, the whole question of the balance between transparency and privacy in social media is core to all of our lives these days. Here are two very useful taxonomies also relevant to the policy development process, and which could be applied to determining levels of privacy for different types of information and audiences in healthcare (as well as others).

Taxonomy of Social Networking and Privacy: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2009/11/a_taxonomy_of_s.html
(via CIS Cyberlaw at Stanford)

Mechanical Poetry: Another Categorization of Social Networking Data: http://mechpoe.blogspot.com/2009/11/another-categorization-of-social.html

Categories: Enterprise · Science2.0/Health2.0
Tagged:

Social Media on Campus – Report Out from Communicators Forum

December 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Yesterday I attended the University of Michigan Communicators Forum, having requested and received permission to livetweet in advance. A couple of us did so, and you will see a few quirky or extraneous comments from the general public as well.

The meeting included some updates for campus communicators as well as some discussions and brief presentations from the social media working groups. These are the notes from the meeting, being archived here. The coding for the table was cribbed from What The Hashtag, which is a tool I highly recommend.

 
December 8, 2009
7:18 am crheinga: I'm at the U-M communicators' forum learning about how U-M uses social media, etc.should be interesting! @UM_SPH @UMSocialWork #commforum
7:28 am pfanderson:

Several of us will be livetweeting this morning the Communicator's Forum discussion on social media #commforum
7:40 am

pfanderson: Met @crheinga @ the #commforum. @mindofandre, wd like to introduce you. She's into #globalhealth #publichealth #socialwork
8:01 am pfanderson:

#commforum starting. David Lampe, Lee Doyle, Steve Schramm, social media reports, Gateway tweaks, new sites BUDGET as emerging issue

8:01 am

pfanderson:

Detroit as a national symbol for all that's wrong with the economy #commforum

8:02 am crheinga: the communicators' forum just started - updates on U-M big picture things. U-M is doing well compared to other institutions #commforum
8:02 am pfanderson: Wow - cut $135million in past 6 yrs. More to come. People are concerns, marshalling communications. Hackett Survey #commforum
8:03 am

crheinga: David Lampe talking about the Hackets survey which assesses costs at our university #commforum
8:04 am pfanderson:

Voice of the staff town hall coming. #commforum Tutorials on funding concepts, like endowment. Prior tutorial went to @whitehouse :)
8:06 am ocdgirl2000: RT @pfanderson: #commforum starting. David Lampe, Lee Doyle, Steve Schramm, social media reports, Gateway tweaks, new sites BUDGET as em ...
8:07 am

pfanderson: Future tutorials on tuition & costcutting #commforum Athletics issues, sports press "going wild". Avg time for NCAA investigation 22months
8:08 am crheinga:

"the president [of U-M] stands behind the coach [Rich Rodriguez]" - just wanted to make it clear #commforum

8:08 am

pfanderson:

"The President (UM) stands behind the coach!" (3x) Evidently folks are not hearing this, reporters keep asking. #commforum

8:10 am pfanderson: Integrating the arts into all campus activities as a significant trend. Crossdisciplinary collaboration as ed trend #commforum ArtsOnEarth
8:11 am pfanderson:

Integrating arts and art making into other disciplines to inspire creativity across all domains. #commforum http://artsonearth.umich.edu/

8:11 am

crheinga:

Arts on Earth starting to gather steam at U-M http://artsonearth.umich.edu/ to learn more! #commforum

8:12 am

pfanderson: Film office, lots of movies being filmed on campus. New one: Trust. New backlot is North Campus Research Center #commforum
8:13 am pfanderson:

Fake National Enquirer cover on screen, "UM Scandal" Big Joke, everyone is laughing. #commforum Humor at a work meeting, goodness! ;)
8:13 am crheinga: Lee Doyle speaking about U-M's presence in the new Michigan film industry #commforum
8:18 am crheinga: U-M block "M" should have a registration mark by it because it adds a little bit of protection. U-M will now be doing this. #commforum
8:18 am pfanderson:

Review of Wordmark/logo policies and recommendations. http://facebook.com/universityofmichigan?ref=ts #commforum #umich
8:18 am crheinga: new registration mark logos will be available soon here: http://www.logos.umich.edu/ #commforum

8:19 am

pfanderson:

Steve Schramm talking about Out of the Blue http://www.bigtennetwork.com/showcase/michigan.asp #commforum highlight campus innovation

8:20 am

crheinga: "Out of the Blue" program on Big Ten Network, Steve Schram #commforum http://si.umich.edu/video/hofer.html highlights cool U-M things
8:20 am snarkyUmich:

lord save us from propagandists blathering about Detroit, economics, and "innovation" #commforum
8:22 am pfanderson: Out of the Blue also at UM YouTube, iTunesU http://www.ootb.tv #commforum embeds available

8:22 am

crheinga:

better website: http://ootb.tv/ can also get the vids on U-M YouTube channel, U-M iTunesU channel, & Michigan Channel in AA (22) #commforum

8:23 am

pfanderson: @snarkyUmich LOL! Well, number of folk couldn't come to meeting, but wanted to participate. Thus tweeting on their behalf. #commforum
8:25 am crheinga:

seeking ideas for future Out of the Blue stories - send to the OOTB ppl http://ootb.tv #commforum
8:26 am pfanderson: Planning an entire show on Green issues at UM, incl Planet Blue #commforum OOTB reaches ~40mil households. Want more stories :)
8:27 am

crheinga: May-Sept the Out of the Blue shows will get more play cuz they won't compete with money-making sports shows #commforum
8:27 am crheinga:

can order hard copy DVDs through U-M production #commforum #OOTB
8:28 am pfanderson: Oooh, QT downlaods, CD purchase. We cd push these to SL audience on Wolverine. #commforum
8:35 am crheinga: students presenting on how marketing ppl at U-M can use the @MichiganDaily for communication #commforum
8:36 am crheinga:

students actually do value print still 77% cite the Daily as primary news source, 90% students read it 3x/wk #commforum
8:36 am

crheinga: the @michigandaily is currently Ann Arbor's only daily print newspaper #commforum
8:37 am pfanderson:

Update on Michigan Daily advertising. Students value print. 18K copies reach 40K fac/stdts. 90% rd 3x/wk #commforum A2s ONLY prt daily paper

8:38 am

crheinga:

U-M's @michigandaily is one of most online college papers in world, ppl read from 165 countries and stay avg of 3 mins each #commforum

8:38 am

pfanderson: MDaily 163,000 visitors online, 165 countries. One of most popular online college newspapers. Online rdrs tend to be older >35yrs #commforum
8:40 am pfanderson:

Recommend using @michigandaily online to reach alumni/parents, geo-diverse audiences. #commforum They did nice job :) Applause
8:42 am WashtenawNews: RT @pfanderson: Recommend using @michigandaily online to reach alumni/parents, geo-diverse audiences. #commforum They did nice job :) Ap ...
8:43 am crheinga: online daily Record update has extra stuff from print version & vice versa #commforum http://www.ur.umich.edu

8:44 am

pfanderson:

Hearing fr University Record. http://www.ur.umich.edu/ Noting Record Update is *diff*. Adding social media, rss, coming Jan 1 #commforum

8:47 am

crheinga: the Record Update is going to be searchable soon! #commforum
8:47 am pfanderson:

Oh, goodie! They figured out they want the news backlog to be searchable. :) #commforum
8:47 am

crheinga: now getting into social media part of the #commforum Global Language Monitor ranked U-M #1 in social media, internet and media
8:48 am crheinga:

largest # Twitter accounts of any university #commforum (follow mine list here: @crheinga/umich)
8:48 am pfanderson: Global Language Monitor ranked UM #1 in social media, internet & media interest. Most # of accts4 Twitter. Revived Facebook page. #commforum

8:49 am

crheinga:

U-M facebook fan page has over 68K fans! #commforum http://www.facebook.com/universityofmichigan?ref=search&sid=2205466.1061267416..1

8:50 am

pfanderson: "Bad thing is you can't control the conversation." I didn't say it folks, just quoting. #commforum Looking at comments on FB page.
8:53 am pfanderson:

RT @crheinga largest # Twitter accounts of any university #commforum (follow mine list here: @crheinga/umich) @pfanderson/umich-annarbor
8:53 am crheinga:

talking about U-M YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/um #commforum (also Spanish channel & @PortalEnEspanol)
8:55 am crheinga:

U-M Spanish YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/UMinSpanish #commforum
8:57 am pfanderson: Social media discussion starting. Video group 1st. Talking abt videos that work, and why. Fun+Human element+Surprise = success #commforum
8:58 am pfanderson: Short, fast paced, visual impact, emotional = new UM video #commforum HD, 3days of video to make 1 minute video. Lot of work.
9:01 am pfanderson:

Tech, history, innovation, cool = UM solar car video #commforum dedicated alumni, parents, people w/ passion 4 topic

9:02 am

crheinga:

U-M solar car video and others showing how to showcase U-M students, faculty work #commforum

9:04 am pfanderson: Fun, energy, cool factor = um north campus Explorth. Michigan Moments. #commforum #video They're talking abt how to make videos for YT
9:07 am crheinga:

presentation from @pfanderson abt social media tech and trends (& sorry abt the comp cord - my battery only lasts 20 mins) #commforum
9:07 am crheinga: "analog" presentation = writing notes on <gasp> paper! with NO powerpoint! #commforum
9:08 am crheinga: found most commonly used sites 4social media at UM. YouTube 4vid, flickr 4pics, twitter 4microblogging, slideshare 4presenations #commforum
9:09 am crheinga: more abt blogging coming up w/blogging committee. trying to find new social media guidelines, FDA creating some #commforum
9:14 am crheinga:

discussion abt monitoring conversations, esp in health area. U-M highly values free speech but does not tolerate hate speech #commforum
9:14 am

crheinga: Laura from blogging team presenting on blogging. why should we even blog if already so many? #commforum
9:15 am crheinga:

project-oriented short-term, or topic-oriented long-term. short example: http://solarcar.engin.umich.edu/blog/ #commforum
9:17 am crheinga: highlighted a few blogs- all look different. want to brand the blogs. want to update mblog to be more user friendly #commforum
9:17 am pfanderson: Matt Adams abt Trends & Tech process & recommended tools. Me on #fdasm importance 4 non-health communicators #commforum
9:18 am crheinga:

blogs are easier to update with fresh content daily than clunkier websites and easier to format #commforum
9:18 am

pfanderson: Blogging team talking about use of blogs for interactive communication & facebook. Blogs seem to endure as mode of communication #commforum
9:20 am crheinga:

FDA social media guidelines disc RT @fdasm FDASM Update: Transcripts from hearings now available on www.fdasm.com. #fdasm #commforum
9:20 am crheinga: question about intellectual property on blogs - could U-M affiliation/branding deter ppl from blogging? #commforum
9:21 am

crheinga: example: www.juancole.com Prof Juan Cole is very international presence but works at U-M. not U-M branded but would be good rep #commforum
9:23 am pfanderson:

@crheinga It doesn't work to make one tool fit all voices. #commforum Dynamic audience conversation on how to brand UM blogs/authors
9:24 am pfanderson: Good suggestion - register UM-authored blogs in DB or discovery tool #commforum
9:26 am crheinga: why have a social media forum at which you can't use social media? #commforum
9:26 am pfanderson:

New: UM Speaks Out section on gateway. Gateway being overhauled for freshness. #commforum Crisis Communication. One source is DPS website

9:27 am

pfanderson:

In 1st hr of campus crisis situation go to http://police.umich.edu, not to gateway, not to library, go to DPS/Police. #commforum

Categories: Enterprise

Making Social Media Economically Viable, Part 1

November 9, 2009 · Leave a Comment

With the economy downturn locally, nationally, and globally, one of the things I’ve been hearing is, “Oh, we need to rebuild those industries that are failing so people can get back the jobs they’ve always done,” with “we” usually being someone else. I am the furthest thing from any kind of economic expert, more a distant dabbler in the concepts. Still, the idea of trying to force success out of something that has already failed hasn’t made sense to me. I’m also uncertain that I like the idea of trying to continue an enterprise model (industrialization) that has proven to have severe negative effects on the health of the species.

Instead of the factory models of production and education and healthcare, I’ve been pondering the potential for micro and local entrepreneurship, implementing the “long tail” approach to diversifying goods and services. I know, the trick will remain how to preserve infrastructure. Still, a more personalized approach to economic growth interests me.

I mentioned this to a frustrated friend a few weeks ago, and his colorful reply boils down to, “Darlin’, not everyone has as much talent as you do. You can’t expect folks to be entrepreneurs, they don’t have as much to offer.” That seemed even MORE wrong to me. Everyone has something to offer. Everyone has special skills, abilities, talents, gifts. Sometimes the value we place as a culture on the “Magpie” bright and shiny gifts undervalue the strength and purpose of the basics in keeping things running. As someone who is perhaps over-endowed with glitzy gifts and talents, I have a profound appreciation for people who are good at the tasks I am NOT good at — who can manage their house, keep things tidy and on schedule, repair the broken dishwasher, keep their checkbook balanced and lawn mowed, upholster the couch, take care of their friends and family, etcetera. I’d be delighted to barter some of my time and talent or cooking in exchange for someone else’s time and talent when those talents fall into areas where I am weak.

I started to look at the following slide presentation because it said “Web 3.0″ which, to most of the folk I talk with means the semantic web, but these folks used it in a completely different way. (That is a good argument for completely ignoring the jargon phrases of “Web 2.0″ and “Web 3.0″, by the way.) They were looking at Web 1.0 as establishing the infrastructure, Web 2.0 as focused on user-created content, and Web 3.0 as making the user-created and user-generated content economically viable. Bingo. So I wanted to share it with you, just to provoke thought, more than anything else.

Categories: Enterprise

I Wish I Had Time to …

September 30, 2009 · 1 Comment

AAARGHHH! I’m going to try to do another blogpost-a-day series on a theme, starting tomorrow, but that means I’m not going to get to blogging about all the super useful, inspiring, brilliant posts I’ve found this past week or so. So here they are, and I hope you have time to look at them more deeply than I am going to.

MetricsMan: In Social Media, Are We Looking For ROI in All The Wrong Places? May 28, 2009. http://metricsman.wordpress.com/2009/05/28/in-social-media-are-we-looking-for-roi-in-all-the-wrong-places/
COMMENTS: Mostly he is asking the question, and it needs to be asked. Not only is this relevant for social media but applies to libraries and other places, too. Ask yourself if what you’re measuring really tells the story? We don’t measure reference activities in a useful way anymore, IMHO. We are working with a project team right now to make communication more effective. Is the communication really not doing what it needs to, or is it that our assumptions of how things ought to work don’t match how they really do? So for ROI, we have all these metrics supplied by the sites, and can say what we’ve done, but it is much harder to say what that means or how it pays off in a tangible measureable way. Don’t just read what he says, but read the comments and discussion.

Mitch Joel. How To Build Your Digital Footprint In 8 Easy Steps. Six Pixels of Separation March 5, 2009. http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/how-to-build-your-digital-footprint-in-8-easy-steps/
* Create a strategy
* Choose channels and apps to match
* Digital footprint audit
* Follow first
* Add your voice
* Start your own, but have a plan
* Stay active and aware
* Have fun
COMMENTS: It took me a month of blogposts to say this. He’s good. Read the whole thing. It’s short.

Arment Dietrich. Quick Tips: Our Newly Launched “S.M.A.R.T. Communication Program©” SmartTalk Issue 9: Aug. 21, 2009 http://www.armentdietrich.com/enewsletters/issue-9-our-newly-launched-smart-communication-program%C2%A9
* Set goals
* Monitor & measure
* Assess existing conversations
* React / Respond
* Transparent
= SMART
COMMENTS: Not only is this a really nifty idea, but you just have to check out the lists of tools he provides for doing these!

Arment Dietrich. Quick Tips:Develop Goals While Listening. SmartTalk Issue 10: Sept. 16, 2009. http://www.armentdietrich.com/enewsletters/issue-10-develop-goals-while-listening
ME: I use and recommend most of these tools. He wrote it, I don’t need to repeat it. Just do it. :)

Olivier Blanchard. Shredding some misconceptions about Social Media – Part 1. The Brand Building Blog September 15, 2009. http://thebrandbuilder.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/shredding-some-misconceptions-about-social-media-part-1/
Myths:
* Social Media only works for some companies
* By participating in Social Media, we will lose control of our image and/or message.
* Social media is just a fad.
COMMENTS: A humorous, human, accessible approach to this topic. I hear a lot of folk talking about this, many with really good ideas. His is just more fun!

Technology and Social Change: Re-Examining Key Assumptions: http://www.slideshare.net/evgeny.morozov/skoll-world-forum

Assumptions (being questioned deeply):
* Data will organize itself.
* Technology will democratize our public sphere.
* Civil society will flourish on the Web.
COMMENTS: Librarians have been challenging the first one for ages. My mentor in grad school, Manfred Kochen, espoused both the other two and wrote research articles showing why it would work. Years later I decided he was perhaps just a little idealistic with respect to how people use and share information. Now the question is if these are not happening, should they, and if so, what would it take?

TEDx Detroit. http://tedxdetroit.com/
COMMENTS: I can’t say “be there or be square” because it isn’t open to everyone and I don’t know if I’ll get in. But I sure want to, and it will be the best possible event with the best crew of folk available. Go. Apply. Pray you are accepted. Come. Be inspired, and inspire others.

Categories: Enterprise

Social Media ROI? Hunh?

September 14, 2009 · 2 Comments

One of the big questions about undertaking anything that an institution or organization hasn’t done before is ROI. Someone asked me this week, “what is ROI?” Well, I’m not a business school geek, so I will keep it really simple and trust others to correct me. ROI = Return On Investment. How much am I going to get out of whatever it is I’m putting money or time into. There are lots of metrics and formula for analysing this if you are a pro in the area. Let me bring it home for simple folk like me.

Example

My lawn mower broke. I have a half acre lawn, not enough money, and not enough time. A push mower is WAY cheaper than a riding mower, but takes a LOT more time. Which do I need more, the money or the time? How much do I enjoy mowing my lawn?

What other intangibles come into the equation that might impact on the decision? If I spend more money on the riding mower, how many times do I have to mow my lawn for it to pay for itself in the time it saves me? What is the expected life of the mower, and how many times should I expect to be able to mow my lawn? Alternatively, if I hire someone to mow my lawn, how many times can I pay them to mow my lawn before it would pay for the mower?

That is ROI thinking. What do I have to put into it, what am I going to get out of it, and how does it balance. You need to include outside factors in any analysis, things that are harder to think up. What if I don’t mow my lawn at all – I can’t find someone to mow it, can’t afford to buy a mower, am snowed with deadlines and just don’t have time to solve the problem right now, whatever. What are the hidden costs of ignoring the problem? Is it OK to offend my neighbors, lose the good will of the folk down the block? Will the scraggly overgrowth interfere with the folks in wheelchairs who use my sidewalk? What if someone complains to the city and I get a ticket for neglecting my yard. How much would that cost?

You get the idea. Most of us do this in our own lives. A lot. We do it in relationships, too. I had a tshirt once upon a time that said something like. “Courtship is when a girl decides if she can do better.” I don’t pretend to understand how folks calculate something like that in a relationship, but obviously folks do.

So for, ROI in Social Media, well, that gets to be a messy idea real fast. The measurements are basically all intangible, the costs are mostly intangibles, the risks are not easily attributable directly to either having or not having social media. The ROI is largely in the realm of anecdotes rather than data. (See my earlier posts on social media metrics and the experts.) I tend to think of the risks and value as what will it cost you if you don’t have it and something bad happens, but that can backfire, since poorly managed social media can cause problems as big as any it solves. Still not being there can be a problem all by itself.

I have trouble explaining the value in a clearcut way that gets right down to dollars. I’m not the only one! Here is a slide presentation I found in which a group of experts work through ideas about ROI in Social Media for healthcare organizations. This is interesting as much for the process and the way in which they included social media in the presentation and surrounding discussion as for the ideas themselves. Take a look.

The ROI for Incorporating Social Media: http://www.slideshare.net/BigBadInc/the-roi-for-incorporating-social-media

Categories: Enterprise · Health, Healthcare, Support, Science

Nielsen Misses the Point

September 9, 2009 · 5 Comments

I return from vacation (hi, everybody!) to find a new post from Jakob Nielsen about usability issues with using social media.

Nielson, Jakob. Social Media Outsourcing Can Be Risky. Alertbox, September 8, 2009. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/social-mega-ia.html

The main point of his article seems to be this sentence: “One of our findings is that the mega-IA decision to host some services on external sites can create usability problems for your customers.” From my point of view, I would tend to reverse this and say something more like this, “The decision to NOT host some services on external sites can create usability problems for your customers.” Let me take a second and explain what I mean, and what I think Nielsen means, and portions are in agreement and some important take home messages are very different.

Nielsen gives a few examples of institutions or organizations hosting their content on social media sites such as YouTube. He talks about how the usability of the content on YouTube is less than ideal when it comes to promoting your brand or identity, and how YouTube has some conventions that are occasionally a bit awkward. I see two problems with how this is handled in his post. First, he blames the usability problems on the enduser and not on YouTube, and second, he doesn’t offer much in the way of suggestions for how people can work with YouTube’s constraints to make things better.

I recently talked about YouTube on this blog and why it is so important for groups or individuals with video content to be sure to place some of that content in YouTube. Briefly, placing the videos in YouTube maximises discovery and accessibility and protects your content/brand. Placing the video in iTunesU establishes academic credibility. Placing the video in Vimeo allows you to offer high resolution video and audio for the more selective audience. Both YouTube and Vimeo offer embedding and sharing, which can link back to your original, making your site more discoverable. Everything embeddable can be put both on your website and in your blog. What I’ve found for my own stats is that videos placed in YouTube get WAY more views than the same video on the website or in iTunesU, on the scale of a factor of ten. It all depends on your topic, your audience, and where they prefer to be. If you think of the web as a Not-One-Size-Fits-All environment you will be on the right track.

OK, that gives you my argument in a nutshell and my understanding of Nielsen’s argument in a nutshell. Let’s look at specifics.

Bad Example?

Nielsen provides a “Bad Example” of the Youtube channel for Deval Patrick, the Governor of Massachusetts. He refers to this as the “Massachusetts Governor’s Site” which is actually here instead. His main concerns were: (1) “same video is represented thrice in the UI”; and (2) “poorly chosen thumbnails.”

Problem #1: Repetition of Content

Repetition of content, icons and links is part of the YouTube standard interface. The enduser can’t really do much about that on the YouTube page. YouTube is what YouTube is, and that is the nature of dealing with social media web services. BUT the enduser can make a video section on their own website and can ensure that the comment or description section of each video includes a link back to the video on their own website where they can control the interface, layout, design, thumbnails, and related factors. This provides a variety of benefits. You have a more discoverable product. You have a more shareable product, since is can be embedded on other people’s websites and blogs, which increases your marketing bang-for-the-buck. You get content in multiple locations to reach multiple audiences. The content drives people back to your main website, increasing traffic there. You also can still have the same content in a place where you have as much control as you want over interface design and quality.

Problem #2: Thumbnails

Well, here again, this is what YouTube does. For the version of the video actually accessed from the YouTube website you can’t pick your thumbnail or icon. YouTube seems to choose a frame that is roughly dead center of the video. You have a choice here. You can edit your video specifically to ensure that the central section of the video has cool catchy images that you want used as a thumbnail. Or you can edit your video to make it the best possible video you can have under whatever your constraints are, and just live with whatever YouTube picks as the thumbnail. There are advantages and disadvantages of both approaches, but it is your decision. If you have a big budget you might be able to do both. If you are doing it yourself as a home-grown operation you might not be able to do either. If you are providing videos that are not edited but are captures of presentations you will probably end up with the same problem that happened the day Nielsen looked at the MassGovernor YouTube channel.

Better?

Nielsen provides a couple “Better” examples – Martha Stewart and Harvard Business Publishing. What he likes about Martha Stewart’s YouTube channel is the thumbnails (which we already discussed), and what he doesn’t like is the lack of easy browsing and searching. The reverse is true for the Harvard Business Review channel. At the end of the essay, Nielsen returns to the MassGovernor channel with a concern about descriptive titling. Let’s take a look at the the last two concerns.

Problem #3: Browsing and Searching in Youtube

IMHO, Nielsen hit the nail on the head with this one. He complains that for the MarthaStewart channel you can’t find the video on blueberry pie without scrolling back to the beginning. I know people who go to YouTube before Google to search for information and it always surprises me since YouTube really isn’t very good at searching. The way YouTube structures the videos, the URLs don’t make it clear what user created the content — you have to actually click through to the content to find out. This makes it even trickier trying to search elsewhere. Nielsen points out that Harvard Business Review has created Playlists of their own content organized by theme to make it easier to find what the visitor wants. This is a really good idea. Better than searching, but searching is still what we have to do most of the time.

Here is how I find videos in YouTube when I am searching for a known item like, for example, the Martha Stewart blueberry pie video that Dr. Nielsen wanted to find.

In Google:
1. Search YouTube as a site
2. Include the name of the user’s channel if you know it.
3. include a keyword or phrase that would be included in the title or description of the video you want.
NOTE: This isn’t perfect, since it will retrieve videos created by other users, but there is no way to limit to just videos created by Martha Stewart. Now, it might be possible with a little SEO work, say, if Martha included a unique tag that denoted her channel, made sure it was included on each video she posted, and prayed that other folks didn’t use it. YouTube doesn’t make this at all easy, but you can work around it, imperfectly.

Example:
site:youtube.com MarthaStewart blueberry

Now Martha’s name is also a common tag, so we could expand the search to include that also, like this.

site:youtube.com (MarthaStewart OR “Martha Stewart”) blueberry

Since we aren’t finding a blueberry pie recipe in Martha’s channel, we can even make sure we are looking for blueberry PIE rather than anything else, by using quotation marks, like this.

site:youtube.com (MarthaStewart OR “Martha Stewart”) “blueberry pie”

You know what? Even if Jakob Nielsen scrolls through all 126 videos in Martha’s channel, he is not going to find one on blueberry pie. There isn’t one.

Blogs: YouTube

Not even if you search through Google Video, which is my other choice for searching YouTube videos.

Blog: YouTube

And the first video is about a dancing dog.

Blogs: YouTube

Problem #4: Titles Can be Powerful or Problems

Another point where Nielsen is 100% right. You want to use short descriptive titles that make it clear what the content is in the video. Then you want to use the description space to provide more information. Keep it clear, keep it simple, but include words that people might search for to find what you’re offering. Also keep tags in mind, and tag appropriately.

Take Home Points

Nielsen closed his essay by putting his concerns in the context of what you lose if you don’t use social media.

“These arguments count in favor of keeping social features on your own site where you can design them to provide a better user experience for your customers. By doing so, however, you give up on the potentially much bigger audience that 3rd-party social networking services (SNSs) offer. “

Very true. You are giving up quite a lot if you don’t engage with social media. Let me return to my original statement: “The decision to NOT host some services on external sites can create usability problems for your customers.” Just looking at the use of YouTube, I’d like to share feedback from people who’ve come to me for help or who have expressed problems in public venues. One of the complaints I’ve heard about videos on websites that are not in YouTube is that people can’t find them. That is a big one, and for this not to be an issue for you, you’d have to have such a big profile that people are checking your site as often as they check YouTube. Ummmmm, unlikely. I’ve also heard a number of complaints specifically from persons with special needs that they have trouble with videos in Vimeo and other video sharing sites. The problem often relates to the fact that they don’t have a lot of money and don’t have the best computers or fast network connections. At this point, Vimeo is for the elite, and YouTube is for the masses. If you want the masses to find and access your content, then put it in YouTube. You can always put it in more than one place. Libraries have a saying that applies here: “Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe” also known as LOCKSS. The LOCKSS mentality doesn’t just apply to keeping stuff safe so that it continues to exist, but also to visibility and discoverability, implied concepts that underlie the library concerns and apply more directly to marketing and enterprise applications of social media.

Nielsen’s final recommendation is to hold onto the good stuff and use social media to share your lesser quality content.

“It’s too early to provide definite advice for how to resolve this conundrum. One possible approach is to feed the outside sites only broadly targeted material that might go viral and/or attract casual browsers, while keeping higher-value specialized material on your own site, including any action-oriented and need-to-know content and discussions.”

This is old school thinking, the way the computing environment worked five or ten years ago, 180 degrees opposed to what you ought to be doing with social media. There are some good points and concerns in the Nielsen essay, and it is worth reading, but please, take the conclusions with a large handful of salt. If you really want to draw people to your website and control your best content, don’t restrict it completely to your website, but provide snippets, free samples, excerpts, and use these to bring people to your primary web site. The more you share, and the more places you share, the more people will find you.

Categories: Accessibility & Usability · Enterprise

Twitter Ethiquette?

August 25, 2009 · Leave a Comment

This is such a clever idea and so well researched and implemented, I don’t feel I need to say a thing. Except.

1. I really like the coinage of the new word “ethiquette” or “ethiqette”, meaning the fusion of ethics and etiquette.
2. (Irrelevant to the blogpost) I am going on “vacation” and you won’t see another blogpost from me until sometime early next month. This assumes I survive being with no internet. Yes, this also means I am going to fail at this attempt at a blogpost a day for a month. I had a choice. Finish the month of blogging, or have a brief but significant vacation when it was offered to me. What would you choose?

Enjoy the slideshow!

Presley, Slywia. Twitter Ethics. http://www.slideshare.net/sylwiapresley/twitter-ethics-presentation

Categories: Enterprise · Twitter

Consider Your Content

August 24, 2009 · 6 Comments

Earlier this year I wrote a post on Facebook groups and fan pages that has become the most popular post on my blog, accounting for a significant amount of the total views. In that post I said a bit about generating content, talked a bit about it, but could definitely say more. Here was the basic outline.

* WHY it is going there
* WHERE it is coming from
* WHEN and how often new items should appear
* WHO is the target audience
* WHO is responsible for content
* HOW is the content getting there

WHY it is going there

There are several reasons to put content in your social media stream (blog, Facebook, page, media sharing sites, etcetera). Driving factors include supporting your vision, communicating a specific message, as part of a campaign or marketing push, in response to activities or queries in your community, and to sustain relationships. In your social media plan, you should have a vision statement, and any content should support that. The plan should also have some general guidelines about how often new content is released. You shouldn’t put up poor quality content just for the sake of meeting a deadline, but you also should not wait and wait for something to say while your audience gets bored and wanders off. Ideally, as part of your social media plan there will be goals for what you are hoping to achieve through the engagement with social media, and the content plan can flow from that.

Just as an aside, although I keep mentioning having a plan, these are not static cast-in-iron type plans, but more fluid evolving trees-and-leaves kind of plans. Your plans will shift in response to your environment and community. Make the plan, but don’t allow it to lock you up so that you can’t move and respond to changes in your environment.

WHERE it is coming from

When you are just getting started in social media it is an easy pitfall to think that everything you say has to be written new and custom just for the blog, or wherever else you plan to put it. That won’t work. Trying to do that quickly becomes so burdensome that some people just give up and quit, or else end up taking a lot of personal time to work on what ought to be handled during the regular business day. This post is not about work-life balance or limit setting, but I will say it is really useful to think to maximizing the impact of your message by placing it in many places and repeating it. For the record, this is exactly what you NEVER want to do with research articles, so it might take a little getting used to.

Let’s think about this. In your day-to-day work, you and your team generate a lot of content. Much of this can also be used in your social media environment, although you might want to slightly revise or style it for the different environments. Here are some ideas from my own experience.

Example One

In the library we teach a lot of classes and do workshops and brownbags. I had been making handouts for the classes. When I started doing a lot of social media, I started making the handouts into slide presentations. I do this whether or not I use the slides in teaching. More and more of the librarians have started to also do this. The slides can go into Slideshare. About half the time the audio is recorded for the presentations. That happens as part of a partnership with have with the School of Dentistry where they are experts with this. We have students sync the audio to the slides, and then we have both a podcast and a slidecast. The podcast goes into iTunesU and eventually either DeepBlue or BlueStream (our institutional online repositories). The presentation or slidecast can be embedded both on our webpage and in one or more of our blogs, with different messages around it for the different audiences of the various blogs. In theory we could also take the podcast and put it in YouTube.

workshop > slideshare > slidecast > podcast > iTunesU > YouTube > blog > webpage …

Example Two

Let’s say there is a project going on, with a lot of research on related topics. Web searches, web pages, articles, bookmarking are all activities that are going on a LOT. Save the more satisfactory web searches as bookmarks, bookmark the articles, do the bookmarking in Delicious or some other social bookmarking took, share them with your colleagues, run an RSS feed for the tags relevant into a project wiki, possibly into a Twitter stream, and archive as a blogpost.

The basic idea is what work are you ALREADY DOING that can be used as is or repurposed to help keep your social media presence lively.

WHEN and how often new items should appear

Now, if your social media stream is already pretty lively, you may not want to overwhelm people by putting everything you do everywhere you go. You also need to watch folks around you in the various social media spaces to see what is normal or expected for that space. I talked about updating my status on Facebook relatively rarely compared to Twitter, only 2-4 times a day. The audience laughed. Most of them update their Facebook status once a day, if that often.

Some people I know have everything they bookmark sent to their Twitter. If I did that, I would double or quintuple my Twitter stream, which could get annoying really quickly. I have friends who do that, or who use their Twitter stream as a dumping ground for things they do in other places. If they do a blogpost a day, a dozen pictures in a Flickr a week, and bookmark a half dozen items a day, that isn’t too much for me. That is me personally, but I don’t look at everything said by everyone I follow.

So, with the idea that this is all highly variable, let’s say a rough estimate of something like this as a suggestion.
– Blog regularly, as long as folks know what to expect that can be defined loosely. Once a week, every other day, once a day are ok, probably no less often than that. If things move slowly in your area perhaps once a month, but realize that people probably won’t be watching for it. You might consider framing longer posting periods as if they are a newsletter or e-zine rather than a blog.
– Update Facebook status daily or every other day, check daily for messages and comments that you should reply to, and set preference to have alerts of messages sent to your email.
– Twitter or microblog at least once a day with your own substantive content (well, 100 characters worth, anyway). Retweet someone else’s good stuff at least twice for everytime you post something of your own. For each tweet or retweet comment on someone else’s stream that is talking about something relevant to yours. In addition, answer all tweets sent to you via direct message or reply or at-sign (@).

WHO is the target audience

Again, this comes firstly from your vision / mission statement, and second from your community and audience. Once you decide who your audience is, that will help you decide the tone you use, how clever, witty, humorous, down to earth, intellectual you are. It also helps shape the topics you choose and how frequently you talk on them. Watch your metrics, and that will help tell you what is working, what is connecting with people. That also tells you if you are connecting with your target audience. If you are consistently getting high views on the odd blogpost that is slightly off target, does that mean you are missing your target audience, or that your real audience is different than you expected?

WHO is responsible for content

The WHO can be interpreted in a few different ways. WHO can be the persona you want to have presented on behalf of the company, the personality. Who is that person, and who an present that personality on behalf of the company?

At the same time, WHO means who is the person deciding what is said, how it is said, and who is the actual person doing the typing. Are these the same person? It is like the old joke about needing a special person in your life who is a good cook, a good conversationalist, a good dancer, a good problem-solver, who you love curling up with at night, and don’t let these people know about each other. Except in social media you need them to all know each other and work together as a good team.

Please, please, please, do NOT make this all one person’s job. Well, I should say if you have a company with more than ten employees. Basically, if you have only one person doing this they will go on vacation, get sick, quit unexpectedly, have times when the rest of their job takes over and they just can’t manage all of the social media stuff as well. For enterprise accounts, you really want a small team with good oversight.

I know of many units on campus who are hiring students to do this, or assigning it to a junior administrative assistant . There are advantages and disadvantages to this. The advantage is that you can get started quickly, without the lead person having to take the time to learn how themselves, and at a lower salary. The disadvantages are many. One major one is that the lead person who decides what to say and why isn’t the person who knows the community and how they talk to each other. The person talking becomes known as The Public Face for the unit, and it can be awkward if that person doesn’t actually have the authority to make decisions or to grab the folks who can when needed. Whoever is actually doing the typing needs a close and trusted working relationship with the decisionmakers, needs oversight and feedback that they are representing the organization as desired, but also needs to be allowed and encouraged to speak freely as a real person, have real conversations and to build relationships with individuals in the community. Handled properly, this can be an opportunity for a junior person to become respected and valued.

HOW is the content getting there

Some content will need to be created for special purposes, which is time consuming and demands expertise, but gives a high quality product. Some of the content can be piped in automatically via RSS streams or tools for posting to multiple sites at once. This can get complicated and deserves to be a post all on its own, but for now think about the balance between how much content you want to have that is machine-driven and how much that is people-driven. These give different messages and are appropriate for different audiences. Which is right for you?

Categories: Enterprise

Finding the Bigger Idea

August 23, 2009 · 2 Comments

Mack Collier just posted this really nice slideshow. It doesn’t sound at first really like Sunday fare, but take a closer look (and chances are you won’t see this before Monday morning anyway).

Collier, Mack. What Rockstars Can Teach You About Kicking Ass With Social Media! http://www.slideshare.net/MackCollier/what-rockstars-can-teach-you-about-kicking-ass-with-social-media

Here are his main points:
1 – Rockstars are fans themselves
2 – Rockstars look for ways to shift control to fans
3 – Rockstars find the ‘Bigger Idea’
4 – Rockstars embrace their fans

Into this he folds ROI, making mistakes and what to do, and all kinds of other useful concepts. The point that was most helpful for me was his “Find the Bigger Idea” bit. I haven’t been saying this very well, but keep trying, and now he has given me a way to explain it better.

I’ve been saying have conversations, talk to people in your community, get to know people, but I’ve been having trouble explaining just how to do this. He gives some lovely concrete examples.

“Kodak doesn’t blog about their cameras, they blog about photography.”

“Instead of posting about how to use LinkedIn … show readers how to use LinkedIn to find a job.”

So to be part of the conversation, think about what you care about, what your customers / clients / community care about, and talk about that, sharing information that matters to them, and connects back to what you are doing. More examples.

MITOpenCourseware works so well because they are sharing content people want. They aren’t saying, “MIT is a great school, you should come here.” They are giving videos, lectures, images and more, and you just know there has to be more you could get out of it if you were only there yourself.

Museums are putting out of copyright or creative commons pictures in Flickr and other photosharing sites. People love this, and want to see more or talk with the curators.

We found this here at the University of Michigan libraries as we moved into digitizing large portions of our collections. When we put older materials online, use of the same items in the library skyrocketed. People wanted to hold the real book in their hands.

Tonight during the HCSM meeting in Twitter, people were talking about how to get certain healthcare populations to engage with social media. Well, it has to matter to them, to their day-to-day lives. Patients aren’t having any trouble at all finding or creating social media spaces for their communities. We’re looking at something similar with trying to reduce barriers to adoption of social media for clinicians and research scientist (more on that later). Basically, how do you show it is useful, and how to make something so useful that they will want to use it?

The same type of question applies to most topics and communities. Find the big idea, what’s important to them, and give them what they want. Mack Collier uses rockstars as his example. I am remembering an old Fats Waller tune, in which one woman advises another on how to keep her man faithful to her. It starts out sounding rather puritanical, then slips into a bit of bump and grind, saying, “Find out what they want, and how they want it, then let ‘em have it just that way … “

Categories: Enterprise

Of Videos and Blogs and Other Beasts

August 22, 2009 · 3 Comments

Elliot Greenberger, the Communications Manager at See3 Communications, wrote a pretty nifty blogpost a couple days ago. I was sharing it with people today at SOLO09 (Science Online London 2009), and thought this was a good time to try to explain here why I thought it was so relevant and useful.

What Elliot wrote was about how to make the most of your video. I’ve been telling folks for months (and have some video to post on the topic) about why it is so important to get your science and research videos into Youtube. It was over a year ago that I was looking for some cell division videos for my high school aged son, and found instead an astonishing number of hard core science teaching and research methodology videos. This included stuff like how to do an ELISA blot, methodologies for immunofluorescence, nano mass spec techniques, protein crystallization, all kinds of stuff. What I noticed was that some of the videos had originally been placed on the web sites of the originating research lab, but not in Youtube. I assume this was because someone felt uncomfortable releasing their content out into the wild, and thought they could control it better on their own website.

So how did these get into Youtube? Someone or several someones had been seeking them out, scraping them off the original websites, splicing out the beginning and ending credits, replacing them with an ad for their website, and adding a banner add for their website across the bottom of the video. They covered themselves by adding a notice that these videos were not their content and they did not own copyright in them. I found this, shall we say, very interesting? Especially since these esoteric and relatively uninteresting videos (uninteresting to the general public anyway) were getting thousands and hundreds of thousands of views.

Since I originally noticed this, I’ve also noticed Youtube really cracking down on this sort of activity, but it really helps if someone brings it to their attention. You need to know your videos, and check to see if they are out there wandering around. I’ve been arguing that the best way to control your content is to put it in Youtube yourself. Some folk complained that videos in Youtube aren’t very high quality. So put it in Vimeo, too, ok? And put a copy of the original on your website. Link the Youtube posting to your website.

This does a few things for you. First, if someone steals your video and tries to put it in Youtube, yours was there first, establishing precedent and already gathering link-backs, comments, embeds and views. If you see your video elsewhere in Youtube, you complain and theirs will be removed by Youtube. Second, Youtube is way up there in the rankings. If your video is in Youtube, people are more likely to find it in a Google or Yahoo search, and if they find the video, they are more likely to find your website. Third, Youtube is one of the leading places people do web searches in general. Not just video searches, but on concepts and topics! This means whatever you have to say is going to be more discoverable if it can be found easily on Youtube as well as Google and Yahoo.

OK, now all this is great for video, you say, but you are not exactly in the video business. So what does this have to do with you? Think about it a second. These same basic ideas and strategies apply to anything you have to say. This is what I liked about Elliot Greenberger’s blogpost. He was talking about how to get more views for your videos, but the same ideas and strategies can easily be applied across social media. Take a minute and go look at Elliot’s post, then come back here and I’ll explain what I mean.

Greenberger, Elliot. How to Get More Views for Your Video. Frogloop, Care2’s nonprofit online marketing blog, August 19, 2009. http://www.frogloop.com/care2blog/2009/8/19/how-to-get-more-views-for-your-video.html

EG’s #1. Optimize Your Video for the Web

This applies to text as well. Remember that there are a lot of different potential audiences on the web. If you are trying to reach multiple audiences either write your content or design your media at different levels — interested outsider, novice, expert, and all the way along the range.

In general, for consumer health and legal documents the plain language experts recommend writing anything that really needs to get out to the general public at a level of American grades 4-8. In the UK this translates in practice to roughly ages 10-14. That could be a whole post on its own, but you get the idea. This is harder to do than it sounds, but if you provide the same content at multiple levels and think of your potential audiences, you are on the right track.

Writing at different levels isn’t enough, though. To optimize your text for the web, you need to also think of how it is laid out, design features, and make sure you pay attention to the use of white space. Short paragraphs, short sentences, short words.

EG’s #2. Recruit Your Email List

What Elliot said here is really really good. Use pictures and graphics. Give color in both visuals, media and stories to engage interest. Make your message something people want to talk about, and tell them briefly what would help most — forward a message, share with friends, retweet, comment, bookmark, what do you want them to do?

EG’s #3. Get It On Your Site

In libraries there is this idea about how to protect and preserve content without having it be a huge burden on any one library. One popular way of expressing this is LOCKSS – Lots Of Copies Keep Stuff Safe. Same idea applies here. Ultimately, your most important message is going to be on your site, not out in the social media. So make sure the important stuff is all on your site, and make sure all your social media stuff somehow sooner or later guides your audience and friends to your home.

EG’s #4. Create Relevant Tags

If you have content out in social media, there are often ways to tag it. Even if the system where you put your content doesn’t allow tagging, as long as you have an URL you can always bookmark it and tag it there. For tagging strategies, I use a couple. First, I tag it the way I think of it to ease refinding for me personally. Second, I look at how other folks are tagging similar items and throw in those terms. You would find that most items in my Delicious stream have a lot of sloppy tags. This is because I want to facilitate finding by others as well as finding by myself. So I combine a tight structured approach with a loose sloppy approach, on purpose.

EG’s #5. Don’t Stop at YouTube

This could say don’t stop at your website. Or don’t stop at your blog. Or don’t stop at Facebook. Or Flickr. Or Twitter. Or Slideshare. Or wherever. It is all a big mesh, interweaving. You don’t put everything in each place, but you do for the big stuff, and anything substantive should probably appear in three places. Where you put things will depend on what you’re putting out and who your community and audience are. If you are working with predominantly visual content you will place that content in different places than if you are working with written ideas, but both will overlap.

EG’s #6. Reach Out to Bloggers

Again, I’d extend this a bit broader. Where is your community, who cares about your content? Talk to them! First find them. Know their names/IDs, what they care about, what they’re working on. If you’ve built a history of sharing good stuff with them (not just your stuff) and really being a valued member of the community, they will do the same for you. Reciprocity. If you are doing good and doing good work, you are on the right track.

EG’s #7. Talk About it Offline

My ideal social network is a2b3. You’ll find a2b3 all over the web, but ultimately it comes back to face-to-face, those weekly lunches with a different and fascinating crowd each week. In my previous job I felt really well connected with what was going on, with regular lunches and coffee meetings, informal social situations with individuals or small groups. People complain about the inefficiency of informal communications, but when you really think about it, try taking away the informal communication paths and see just how efficient you are without them.

EG’s #8. Run Online Ads

This one applies to marketing. It is an extension of #6 and #7. It can be taken a bit broader, though. Even if you are an educator, the basic idea is that sometimes it is worth putting money into something you want said well and that it is important to have people hear. Think of going to a conference and looking at a warehouse sized floor of poster presentations. You can tell which ones are “homegrown” versus the ones where they hired a graphic artist to help with the layout. Where do you tend to spend the most time looking at the content? The ones where the content is easy on the eyes. So maybe the money you put isn’t going into an online advertisement if you are teaching or presenting research, or maybe it is if you are doing enterprise marketing. It all depends. Just don’t be afraid to put your money where your mouth is when it really matters.

EG’s #9. Link Link Link

OK, I can’t say this any better than Elliot did, or at least not significantly different. “That means putting [your link] in your email signature, posting on Facebook and Twitter, including it in your next byline, and sharing it in forums, online communities, and comments.” Yeah. What he said.

Categories: Enterprise · How To · Thoughts