Emerging Technologies Librarian

Entries categorized as ‘Workshops & Presentations’

FDASM Introduction

December 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Since this discussion has come up about how the FDA might regulate conversation within social media, I’ve been talking about it to everyone who stands still briefly. Basically, I think this is IMPORTANT.

So when I was asked to talk about FDASM in Second Life to an international group of health care consumers, educators and advocates, I said, “When? This weekend?”

SL: Virtual Ability: Introduction to the FDASM

There was a great discussion there, which will take me a little time to pull together, so that will come in a few days, I hope.

I figured anything I put together for them would be useful for other groups as well, so put the slides in Slideshare and here, thinking they might be useful for background in preparing for our campus forum on the FDASM the last week of January. More info on that coming soon, but in the meantime, here are the slides.

Categories: Science2.0/Health2.0 · Second Life · Workshops & Presentations
Tagged:

National Educational Technology Plan Public Forum in Second Life

November 6, 2009 · 2 Comments

Very briefly, we just completed the event that has been keeping me so busy the past couple weeks. I’ll say more over the next few days, but for right now, just a tiny pointer to more info.

There was an awful lot of excitement that Barry from the national team actually came into Second Life, listened and conversed with the audience for the whole thing (over 2 hours). Here is a picture of Barry.

SL - National Educational Technology Plan, Public Forum, 2009

We will be archiving chatlogs and other content at SimTeach. Expect this will appear over a few days or weeks.

The Flickr group is started. If you were there, please add your images of the event.

Second Life – National Educational Technology Plan Event: http://www.flickr.com/groups/1283817@N23/

There will be a variety of videos that will become available. Miraculously, the first one IS already available! I can’t embed it here, but I can sure point you to it. Enjoy!

http://tinyurl.com/netp09/
SL - NETP - Livestream Video

Categories: Education · Events / Calendar · Second Life · Tools for Learning · Trends

Systematic Reviews: Methodology, Overview, Sharing

October 18, 2009 · 3 Comments

In my previous job, a big part of what I did was systematic review searching. This is still going on as I am on a Cochrane team and a few grants. Technically, this isn’t probably emerging technologies. On the other hand I’ve found that with many “new” technologies it is all about who thinks it is new. For example, I’ve been teaching classes on using Delicious for at least five years, and there are still many people I work with now who have never heard of it. For them, Delicious, now approaching its 6th birthday, is an emerging technology.

Despite the popularity of systematic reviews in the medical literature, it is just now starting to really make the leap from being something a bit on the obscure side to something everyone has heard of. I think what is making the difference has been the push in many schools to include evidence based health care in the training of new clinicians, and to encourage graduate students to do systematic reviews as their research project.

My personal experience with systematic reviews goes back to roughly 1999 or 2000, when I was contracted by NIH to do systematic review searches for 13 of the teams preparing for the first Consensus Development Conference to require use of systematic review methodologies for all presenters.

NIH: Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life (2001): http://consensus.nih.gov/2001/2001DentalCaries115html.htm

NIH: Consensus Development Conference on Diagnosis and Management of Dental Caries Throughout Life (2001) (University of Michigan, University Libraries): http://www.lib.umich.edu/health-sciences-libraries/nih-consensus-development-conference-diagnosis-and-management-dental-carie

I’ve lost track of how many systematic reviews I’ve worked on since that time, but it is a lot, ranging from graduate student projects to Cochrane teams, searching on topics with large research bases to those with almost no research. The techniques appropriate for searching in these various areas are very different. My particular area of expertise is searching in topics where there is a very small research base, meaning instead of seeking clinical significance the researchers are doing a preliminary project to define the levels and quality of evidence available on that topic. What I’ve noticed for many years now is that many of the articles published as systematic reviews do not actually follow an appropriate methodology for the topic being investigated. Another challenge is that many of the published systematic reviews do not include enough information about the search strategy for it to be replicated or verified by other research teams. I’m far from being the only person who has noticed this! Here is the most recent article I’ve seen examining the quality of published systematic reviews.

Song F, Loke YK, Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009 Apr 3;338:b1147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1147. PMID: 19346285

The methodological “Bible” for doing a systematic review to determine clinical effectiveness is the Cochrane Handbook.

Cochrane Handbook: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ OR http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/

Like the actual Bible, it takes a long time and a lot of work to actually read the Cochrane Handbook, making it impractical for many of the busy clinical researchers who are exploring the idea of publishing a systematic review. On many of the Cochrane systematic review teams the primary role of the librarian is to provide the data being analyzed. I have been finding that my experience having worked on so many teams and systematic review projects has placed me also in the role of providing assistance and insight to new systematic review team leaders with respect to the process and methodologies that should be followed. This actually makes a lot of sense, since both the statistician and the librarian on these projects are more likely to participate in large numbers of reviews, across a variety of topics. It also means that I have a large personal collection of search strategies I’ve developed for other reviews that can be quickly tapped or reworked, making the time required for the search process sometimes much faster.

Increasingly, when I work on a systematic review team I ask permission for the search strategy to be archived (post-publication of course) on a public web site to make it easier for other librarians to find and use. The NIH CDC on Caries was the first time we did that.

EBHC Strategies: http://ebhcstrategies.wetpaint.com/

A more fully fleshed out wiki is here:
EBM Librarian: http://ebmlibrarian.wetpaint.com/

EBHC is focused on creating a collection of search strategies to share
among other librarians so folks don’t need to reinvent the wheel; EBM
Librarian is more a tutorial, a detailed how-to as a collaboration of several of the most expert EBHC librarians and teachers.

I like the idea of both using social media and technologies (my ‘new’ job) to help share information both on methodologies and findings from systematic reviews (my ‘old’ job). The wikis are a great start, and I very much hope more medical librarians get involved with both of them. I’d like to see a more active online community of people working in evidence based health care, as well as placing findings more aggressively in social media spaces. Again, others thought of this first. :)

Cochrane Collaboration:
– Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=63721740498
– Twitter: http://twitter.com/CochraneCollab

You can find out more about Cochrane’s social media presence and strategy in these slides from Chris Mavergame at Cochrane.

I’m actually writing this blogpost as a sequel to a guest lecture I recently gave for Tiffany Veinot’s class on medical librarianship at the University of Michigan School of Information. To put my money (time) where my mouth is, I’d like to share those slides also. Creative Commons 3.0 licensing applies, so feel free to download and share.

Categories: Health, Healthcare, Support, Science · Librarianship · Workshops & Presentations

“Saying Nix To Big Deals and the Terrible Fix”

September 23, 2009 · 1 Comment

This morning I was lucky to be able to attend a presentation by Ted Bergstrom called “Some Economics of Saying Nix To Big Deals and the Terrible Fix.” Professor Ted Bergstrom of the University of California, Santa Barbara has been collaborating with Paul Courant and Preston McAfee to learn about the deals behind Big Deals and find out what the contracts really say. One juicy tidbit was that similar institutions for similar contracts can pay as much as double (or half) of what others are paying, making the idea of a costs formula basis for pricing clearly a fiction.

The short version of his finding is encapsulated in Ado Annie’s “Cain’t Say No” song from the Rogers & Hammerstein musical Oklahoma.

I’m jest a girl who cain’t say ‘no,’
I’m in a terrible fix!
I always say, ‘Come on, let’s go,’
Jest when I oughta say ‘Nix.’

The idea (oversimplified) is that the commercial publishers, like Elsevier, are the sweet-talkin’ fine young men and the libraries are Ado Annie, with a heart of gold but without a lick of good sense. In the show, Ado Annie ends up rescued (sorta’) by a combination of her sensible father and the young man who truly cares and is really on her side. The idea in this presentation is to look at the stories we are being told, how they are being told, what the real story is, and to generally piece together a sensible response beyond that of a young woman flattered that the peddlar will offer her a special deal if he can steal a few kisses on the side.

I was able to livetweet the event (until my battery ran out), which generated some interesting conversations with people from Philadelphia PA, Brockport NY, West Lafayette IN, Albuquerque NM, Denver CO, Lebanon NH, and even local folk from Ann Arbor who weren’t able to attend!


–> BEGIN LIVETWEET <–

* WARNING: Will be minimally livetweeting talk by Ted Bergstrom on economics of library subscription models.
* He starts by making interesting parallel between how libs select/pay journals & drs prescribe for patients – payer's not selector
* "monopolistic paradise" & California power plant economics, w/gov paying but industry setting price. Oops! "Enter ENRON"
* Interesting look at the relatively equitable historical model of paper publishing, w/ 1copy=1sub pricing + shelf space 4 storage.

  • navi: RT @pfanderson “monopolistic paradise” & California power plant economics, gov paying but industry setting price. Oops! Enter ENRON
  • me: @navi Well, isn’t that what libs are doing? State school, gov pays, publishers set prices, and (per California) the taxpayers lost

* w/ web access, publisher goal is extract as close as possible 2 ALL library’s “surplus” budget via Big Deals. New jrnls not added
* Big Deals created “crack journals” w/ faculty addicted 2 online access, unwilling 2 use print. “Can’t just say no” Audience laughs.
* Ted describes getting ALL of Elsevier’s journals as “freedom contract”, not getting all is called “complete contract.” More laughs.

  • srharris19: @pfanderson Freedom *from* your money! :)
  • me: @srharris19 Exactly! “freedom contract” means faculty get everything for free
  • srharris19: @pfanderson I’m on an anti- big deals kick. I want access to everything, want to pay based on what we actually use.
  • me: @srharris19 I hope Ted puts his slides on Slideshare or video online. His model does what you want.
  • srharris19: “Big deal” subscription packages are “just in case” collection development. Pay a lot for stuff that doesn’t get used… just in case!

* Oooh, scary — ask faculty to pay-per-view. Uh hunh. Right. Elsevier charges ~$35/view for individuals.
* Ted points out that publishers don’t provide stats / metrics that allow libs to evaluate what we’re spending and how it is used
* Hehehe. Non disclosure agreements block libs fr sharing contracts w/ econs studying models. FOIA saved the day. “Pursuant to …”

  • srharris19: @pfanderson We’re an open records state. Non-disclosure clauses are invalid. Yay!

* Ted keeps emphasizing that costs 2 publishers 4 online access approach 0%, but costs 2 libs R significantly greater than 1% (~7%)
* Interesting comment – libns like contracts kept secret to promote fiction they are getting a “deal”. But secrets actually hurt all
* He isn’t even mentioning the problem that users pay for their own access not realizing library already paid.
* Propose PPV 4 endusers. Works in no-fail resources, but not when quality is an issue, & endusers not best informed 4 choice #health
* “so long as monopolist 4profit publishing survives, these $$ R as real 2 U’s as heating/electric, shd B economized” Bingo.
* Does it make economic sense for monopolist publishing models to survive?
* Why Elsevier has such small profits, when small publishers like OSA charge less & make higher profits? Administrative overhead?

  • jokrausdu: @pfanderson How is 30-40% profit small for Elsevier? OSA=optical society of America?
  • jokrausdu: @pfanderson How can a non-profit society publisher make a “profit”? The money is put back into society activities, conferences, etc.
  • me: @jokrausdu Actually, he said that. OSA pushes profits back into RESEARCH!! What a concept, eh?

* Efficiency: allow online access at no added cost, or not pub journal at all if setup exceeds value to audience
* Oh, this is cool. Model proposed that rewards authors for publishing in cheap journals – cheap=more readers, more cites

  • jokrausdu: Faculty want to publish in high “impact” journals with high readership, not always = cheap. @pfanderson You prob. already know that though.
  • me: @jokrausdu Yes – he is proposing pricing model to shift high impact to cheaper journals. Wish I understood better.

* Drop Big Deal subscriptions. Subscribe to avg cost jrnls as needed. Subsidize pay per view in *part*, user bears rest of cost.

  • novoseek: follow @pfanderson and for tracking talk by Ted Bergstrom on economics of library subscription models.

Twitter: LiveTweet #libecon

* Praises institutional repositories, esp local one 4 contract to host Elsevier articles by local authors. Authors to provide copies
* Can publishers really stop authors from sharing copies of their own articles?

  • BudGibson: @pfanderson According to copyright law, yes.
  • me: @BudGibson He says not for last draft of article – faculty can share that with impunity.
  • BudGibson: @pfanderson So, I guess the publisher only has copyright for the version that is actually published.
  • me: @BudGibson Exactly. Publisher owns the copy they format and edit, not the copy as submitted.

* He mentions that more and more people are putting early drafts of articles online with no penalty.
* Q fr audience: how do we know if we need the article before we pay for it? How do we sample? We risk time spent plus cost of access
* Ted personally will not write, publish or review for journals that charge over $1000 for a year subscription.
* Q fr audience: remembering early computer use fees as parallel to current dynamic. Interesting. Wd make gd article.
* Another option – get libraries out of business as paying for subscriptions. Charge to grants, user pays fees, etc.
* Reputation of existing journals is what monopoly is built on. Doesn’t erode quickly, and won’t if freedom contracts persist.
* what would user fees/ PPV do to interlibrary loan? Ouch. That would take some negotiations.

  • davideisert@pfanderson I would stop using the library and just buy from Amazon, Borders, or B&N
  • me: @davideisert Hard to buy research journals from Amazon, Borders, Barnes & Noble. Probably in future …
  • davideisert@pfanderson But that isn’t what I am getting from ILL. Local library typically has what I need.
  • me: @davideisert Here in MI, state is closing state library & funds 4 publibs. Then you can’t get it. Can’t assume local library will persist

* Q: How do publishers maximise their profit? How do nonprofits succeed at this better? A: What gets called profits? Fancy accounting
* Hmmm. Blackwell divides online subscription fees rcd by cost of journal. Nonprofits charge less, receive less.
* MI, WI, IL Elsevier contracts for “freedom contract” 2mil, 2.3 mil, 1.2 mil – Wisconsin got the “good” deal

  • Rudilibrarian: Which was IL?
  • me: Illinois.
  • Rudibrarian: @pfanderson got that — was wondering which number? And hearing my SUNY peeps cry
  • me: @Rudibrarian There was a lot of backchat in the room when those numbers came out! We paid almost double WI. Ouch.
  • me: @Rudibrarian I’m not sure, but I *think* IL was the 2mil, and MI the 2.3mil.
  • loganrath: @pfanderson how’d they negotiate that??
  • @loganrath He doesn’t know backstory.

* Battery out, have to stop. SORRY! Will blog.
–> END LIVETWEET <–


Final discussion and comments included this bits.
From the audience (mostly Scott Martin at this point):
– Libraries should be thinking of collections, not conduits.
– Many people accessing something doesn’t mean it is good.
– The idea that additional access costs $0 is an article of faith, not a guarantee for the future.

Q: What about blogs and Science 2.0 for self-publishing and collaborative science and research? How could this impact on economic models?
A: Organized open access such as PLoS still tends to have what seems to be excessive costs to preserve online access. What is the money for? Where is it going? PLoS actually has negative profist. Why? Still, for those topics where blogging is possible and effective, this may have some impact.

Learn more:
Ted Bergstrom: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/ OR
http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/%7Etedb/Journals/BundleContracts.html.

Categories: Librarianship · Science2.0/Health2.0 · Twitter · Workshops & Presentations

IfPeople’s Tips and Thoughts on Social Media Planning

July 29, 2009 · 1 Comment

I’m working on my how-to session this afternoon on enterprise use of Facebook and Twitter. Found this presentation on planning your social media strategy that I really like.

IfPeople: Developing a Social Media Plan: http://www.slideshare.net/ifPeople/developing-a-social-media-plan-1323287

Categories: Enterprise · Workshops & Presentations

Online Presentation Tools for Researchers

July 23, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I gave this presentation a week ago, but forgot to post it. The focus is less on the range of tools available (lots more interesting stuff that I show here!), and more on the ways in which researchers do or could use presentation and collaboration tools.

Online Presentation Tools for Researchers: http://www.slideshare.net/umhealthscienceslibraries/online-presentation-tools-for-researchers

I am actually thinking that I should maybe do another presentation just on new and emerging presentation tools. Fun stuff!

Categories: Research · Tech, Tools, Toys · Workshops & Presentations

Video: Who, Why, and How We Serve

June 21, 2009 · Leave a Comment

I am delighted with the short highlights video version of my presentation for the MLGSCA group in March in Cerritos California.. The complete talk will be put on the Health Sciences Libraries website fairly soon, but in the meantime, please enjoy these excerpts.

The talk focused on a vision of collaborative librarianship, based out of the history of the profession and extending through potential applications of new and social media.

Categories: Events / Calendar · Health, Healthcare, Support, Science · Librarianship · Podcasts & Videos · Science2.0/Health2.0 · Second Life · Tech, Tools, Toys · Thoughts · Workshops & Presentations

Gateway Tools in Online Social Technology: Online Scheduling

May 13, 2009 · 4 Comments

This is one part of our series introducing social technology tools that we think will be particularly useful for people in general, and especially for academics and researchers.

Categories: How To · Lifehacks · Science2.0/Health2.0 · Tech, Tools, Toys · Workshops & Presentations
Tagged:

Mobile-izing the Library

May 11, 2009 · 4 Comments

Edward Vielmetti gave a preliminary presentation on the potential use of mobile devices and cell phones for providing library services and resources. Here are my notes from his presentation.

===========================

worst possible interface
– screen is too small
– poor user interface
– keyboarding

Assumption that it is a waste of time to try to adapt because of barriers
Challenges fitting archaic systems into mobile footprint and tech

Bookstore side of the world driving this more than libraries
– Kindle
– revival of Star Trek franchise

Wind back to late 1940s
Vannevar Bush, Memex
trailblazing
production workstation
scientific production
would have taken a whole desk > physical size

What if the Memex was your mobile device?
What would it look like?

Collecting things, not just passively absorbing/reading
– pictures
– record audio
– communicating with others, the authors,
– public production
– with you everywhere
– your access to the World Brain is not just behind yr desk, but everywhere you are

What portions of a library fit in a mobile world?
– source of handbooks, manuals and field books
– ready reference
– ePocrates (drug info and PDR type of tool) (lots of info, frequently updated)
– ie World Radio Television Handbook >> embed this in your radio
– ie Star Trek tricorder (“I’m a doctor, not a librarian, Jim”) device with sensors being informed by books, embedded in the device
– embedded / embodied knowledge “baked into” the device
– fiction becomes interactive fiction
– UNIVERSAL DEVICE
– notion of traditional library activities meshing with mobile devices (ship’s computer)
– upload, download, query
– Hamlet as the right size device > pocketbook
– Google model? will you get back the right answer?
– is it a perfect memory? logging items, will they be there forever and not disappear
– can this advocate on your behalf with others?
– if the first question doesn’t get useful answer, can the device continue searching without your direction?

OK, fictional landscape covered.

To design good user interfaces, we have to think beyond what they can do right now.
Tech is moving fast enough that you can’t catch up, you need to lead
You’d be dissatisfied everytime
Tap into people’s imagination of what it could be

EG. Reading Kafka’s “The Trial” while waiting for jury duty.
– locate
– download
– reader software
– read
– does it fit on this screen?
– has it been digitized?
– rights to it? public domain? licenses negotiated on my behalf

“Any book ever written could fit HERE.”

What if my vision is bad?
– Audio
– text to speech
– ask someone for help to find and they will queue it for me

Planning and decisions developed by REAL patterns of use

How wonderful could it have been, could it be?

From the LIBRARY point of view:

Relationships:
– patron
– support library through taxes, donations
– subscribers
– friends of the library

Similar to Bookstores, but not always equivalent
– “buy NOW”

Metrics
– circulations, not sales
– measures of success?
– “renew all my books now” button >> on phone? why not?
– authentication barriers
– no real API
– would need undocumented system access

patron innovation frustrated by library system complexity

how to empower your patrons to solve your problems?
crowdsourcing yr endusers

customer relationship gives you clear success metrics
libraries lack clearcut success measure with mobile systems

maybe just “we got good press”

Library relations with their communities?
– who cares enough about you to try this out?

Mashup Power
– top ten most circulated books
– what’s hot this week
– mosaic of cover images
– outsider visions of potential

Is the book too big to fit inside the screen? Well, the cover pic will fit.
Browsing the stacks with your mobile device
iTouch interface for browsing

browse the cover art or table of contents for books on the 6th floor via your mobile device
NOTE: words are hard to read on the small screen

navigation tools get you into the building, but not through the building

VIDEO: Harlan Hatcher Graduate Labyrinth

Useful things a library could do:
– wayfinding information
– convert full page maps to handheld application
– race to the location > scavenger hunts in lib
– library as game

Keep it light, or you’ll be frustrated by the device
exit the practical every once in a while

ways people have built systems for mobile use
A. good behavior > some one else has already built reference info for device
– Library (Brown?) menu of relevant items for mobile menu
– discovery and sharing of tools created by your users
– risk: people sometimes remove apps they’ve made
– systems that are well adapted to mobile access
– Buses >> system down for 6 weeks at coldest time of year, politics
– parking spaces >> was not launched properly , system use resulted in access cut off access to the data
– partnerships, data sharing, who owns/supports data?
– intellectual property murky for much of this
B. Beyond technical issues of squeezing things onto small screen
– Kindle > does it fit in your pocket?
– small enough to carry
– large enough to see and type
– Memex
– reserve items via device >> texting (Like TrialX for CTs)
– reading something, want to fetch other item, “Buy Now” button as “Reserve Now”
– capture trail of what I’ve already read
– Reference collections
– what sorts of materials
– miserable user interface to e-ref sources
– logins, permissions, interfaces
– accessible formats
– Using SMS or Twitter for query/access
– How much paper would we save by putting bus schedules onto mobile devices?
C. Private wiki
– personal library
– papers
– articles
– chapters from books
– quotations
– snippets
– commonplace book

Devices: size comparison
contrast mobile devices with comptuers

What sort of things are in libraries that could be used on mobile devices?
(What are books?)
phonebooks
what happens to the newspaper when it isn’t paper anymore?
reading on the bus

what can you fit on a 3×5 card?
mobile device as business card
postcards
writing changing to fit in small spaces
– postcard poems
– twitter novels

How libraries interact with people who are not their typical patrons?
– children’s rooms, how to find all libraries with nice children’s rooms in geographic area
– locations/hours of local libraries while traveling
– have our patrons shifted with mobile population?

using library catalog on mobile device really tells you how bad your search itnerface is

Wish I had examples of wonderful interfaces, but I don’t right now. They are coming.

Different information needs, different information access

Questions that can be reframed if you assume that people have no computers

===============
Q&A

NYT article: mobile device to identify plants along a park path
birding

device add-ons
– pedometer
– GPS maps

reference
– people
– good set of friends to ask good questions
– chacha
– trialx
(take people who are too helpful with a grain of salt – they might have a hidden agenda)

Match making service: news stories sources match up with reporters writing on topic

Categories: Events / Calendar · Librarianship · Mobile · Trends

More of Jane McGonigal’s Talk – the SLIDES

May 5, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Yesterday I posted my notes from Jane’s talk. Here are the slides. Put the two together, and you should have some good stuff! Better yet – go see her. This was the best keynote I’ve seen at Enriching Scholarship in years.

Categories: Events / Calendar · Gaming