Last Week in the Arxiv: H-Index, Healthcare, Public Health, Pinterest, Philosophy, and More


As an emerging technologies librarian, I scan information in many different places. For the most part, I end up scanning spaces (Twitter, Google Plus, Facebook, Pinterest, etc), sources (MIT Tech Review, Gizmodo, GigaOM, TechHive), and events (TEDMED, other TED & TEDx spaces, Healthdatapalooza, CTIA Awards, Horizon Report, many more) as well as innumerable blogs and a ton of other places where people also scan and post emerging tech information. Many of the news sources and blogs I track follow other blogs I track, and it seems like ideas and discoveries float back and forth in that community, with daisy chains of this via A who found it via B who found it via C. and on and on. Typically, I always feel behind on what’s the new thing, because I’m finding out not just second hand, but more like 10th hand. Even if that’s still ahead of most people I know, I still feel behind, as if what I am doing is reactive instead of anticipatory or proactive, although that really depends on context and point of view, I guess..

There are very few places I can go scan easily for new discoveries and actually be one of the first to notice it. Peer-reviewed journals sometimes qualify. Proceedings of conferences are better for new info but harder to access and to identify what’s most important. The Arxiv is one of my favorite places where I can consistently discover the very newest and most interesting trends. Some folk might say, hey, wait a sec, that’s where they collect PHYSICS articles, there’s nothing there for healthcare or librarianship! You might be surprised. I don’t normally collect these here, but I thought I would once, just to show what it’s like. Here are the pieces from Arxiv that I was noticing last week, covering h-index, healthcare, social media, mathematics, and more.

These first two didn’t fit in the other categories, so I am mentioning them separately. I thought the NSF Proposal Review Pilot is of exceptional interest to anyone in biological or life sciences who are involved with grant processes, either competing for funds or in administrative roles. The Satta piece on person re-identification ties in with my current interests in transparency & privacy, and how both of these relate to security at both the national and personal levels.

Incentives, Quality, and Risks: A Look Into the NSF Proposal Review Pilot
Parinaz Naghizadeh, Mingyan Liu
(Submitted on 24 Jul 2013)

Appearance Descriptors for Person Re-identification: a Comprehensive Review
Riccardo Satta
(Submitted on 22 Jul 2013)

* Hirsch Index & Bibliometrics

The h-index is truly part of hard core librarianship, at least in the sciences. The h-index is a subset of the field of bibliometrics through which mathematics is applied to assessing the influence of an author’s work. The goal is to assess quality less through bias and more through actual performance. The impact factor was developed more to assess journal title influence overall, and had been being misapplied to assess author quality. Probably not coincidentally, the h-index was first proposed also in a posting to the Arxiv! In this set of recent articles posted to the Arxiv, there are so many pieces on the h-index it makes my head spin, along with some broader pieces looking at trends and significance in bibliometrics and scientometrics.

H Index of scientific Nursing journals according to Google Scholar Metrics (2007-2011)
Liliana Marcela Reina Leal, Rafael Repiso, Emilio Delgado Lopez-Cozar
(Submitted on 16 Jul 2013)

On house renovation and coauthoring (with a little excursus on the Holy Grail of bibliometrics)
Roberto Piazza
(Submitted on 22 Jul 2013)

The “Academic Trace” of the Performance Matrix: A Mathematical Synthesis of the h-Index and the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3)
Fred Y. Ye, Loet Leydesdorff
(Submitted on 13 Jul 2013)

The predictability of the Hirsch index evolution
Michael Schreiber
(Submitted on 23 Jul 2013)

Is there currently a scientific revolution in scientometrics?
Lutz Bornmann
(Submitted on 24 Jul 2013)

* Life Sciences & Healthcare

If anyone questioned the relevance of scanning the Arxiv for emerging technologies in healthcare, this should set that question to rest. Innovations in breast scanning, Robotic surgery, brain mapping, colon cancer, and genomics are all represented in this set. The cancer data warehouse evaluation could have easily fit into either the healthcare set or the librarian set.

Evaluating a healthcare data warehouse for cancer diseases
Dr.Osama E.Sheta, Ahmed Nour Eldeen
(Submitted on 12 Jul 2013)

AliBI: An Alignment-Based Index for Genomic Datasets
Hector Ferrada, Travis Gagie, Tommi Hirvola, Simon J. Puglisi
(Submitted on 24 Jul 2013)

Reconstruction of gene regulatory network of colon cancer using information theoretic approach
Khalid Raza, Rafat Parveen
(Submitted on 14 Jul 2013)

Human Brain Mapping based on COLD Signal Hemodynamic Response and Electrical Neuroimaging
Revati Shriram, M. Sundhararajan, Nivedita Daimiwal
(Submitted on 16 Jul 2013)

Robotic Arm for Remote Surgery
Steven Dinger, John Dickens, Adam Pantanowitz
(Submitted on 22 Jul 2013)

Numerical Methods for Coupled Reconstruction and Registration in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Guang Yang, John H. Hipwell, David J. Hawkes, Simon R. Arridge
(Submitted on 23 Jul 2013)

* Public Health

Yes, I could have included these in the section above on healthcare. I thought it might be sufficiently surprising to others to find articles on public health in the Arxiv that it was worth breaking them out in their own section to draw attention to the fact. Now, of course, those involved in epidemiology, mathematical modeling of health concerns, and health statistics (topics that fit nicely in the scope of the Arxiv) may be less surprised. These two pieces are both on the spread of diseases, and modeling of these. I particularly found of interest the first piece on how relationships between two people can impact the spread of disease in much larger communities. Puts a rather different color on romantic breakups!

Beginning and end times of dyadic relationships control disease spreading in empirical contact data
Petter Holme, Fredrik Liljeros
(Submitted on 24 Jul 2013)

Mathematical models for epidemic spreading on complex networks
Wojciech Ganczarek
(Submitted on 21 Jul 2013)

* Social Media & Networks

Many of the pieces in this group focus on critical contemporary issues such as trust, collaboration, decision making, information discovery, searching, normative behaviors, as well as tools and visualization modalities to simplify and speed up discovery and analysis in these areas. But, yes, there is actually a research piece on Pinterest! How could I not love a piece titled, “The Pin-Bang Theory”?

Extracting the trustworthiest way to service provider in complex online social networks
Lianggui Liu
(Submitted on 18 Jun 2013)

Online Communities: Visualization and Formalization
Jonathan P. Bowen
(Submitted on 23 Jul 2013)

The Pin-Bang Theory: Discovering The Pinterest World
Sudip Mittal, Neha Gupta, Prateek Dewan, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru
(Submitted on 18 Jul 2013)

Attention and Visibility in an Information Rich World
Nathan O. Hodas, Kristina Lerman
(Submitted on 17 Jul 2013)

Crowd-assisted Search for Price Discrimination in E-Commerce: First results
Jakub Mikians, László Gyarmati, Vijay Erramilli, Nikolaos Laoutaris
(Submitted on 17 Jul 2013)

Influence of media on collective debates
Walter Quattrociocchi, Guido Caldarelli, Antonio Scala
(Submitted on 16 Jul 2013)

* Mathematics, Big Data, & Philosophy

The Aaronson piece on Turing is a tempting philosophical and historically flavored short book. Cooper talks about embodied computation. I am not sure yet what he means by that phrase, but I’ve been increasingly fascinated by trends toward what I think of as embodied devices — computational and self-tracking healthcare devices that are literally embedded in the body, and thus … embodied? Big data is currently not just an interest of mine, but also of many of my colleagues working with various research facilities around campus, our data librarians, and the ICPSR data archiving folk as well. And mazes? Well, they are always interesting, and lessons about how humans solve physical or visual mazes may also lead to insights in human decisionmaking in other areas. Try to prove that medical decisionmaking does not involve similar strategies to those used in solving mazes. Yeah, I thought so.

The Ghost in the Quantum Turing Machine
Scott Aaronson
(Submitted on 2 Jun 2013 (v1), last revised 7 Jun 2013 (this version, v2))

The Mathematician’s Bias – and the Return to Embodied Computation
S. Barry Cooper
(Submitted on 19 Apr 2013)

Rethinking Abstractions for Big Data: Why, Where, How, and What
Mary Hall, Robert M. Kirby, Feifei Li, Miriah Meyer, Valerio Pascucci, Jeff M. Phillips, Rob Ricci, Jacobus Van der Merwe, Suresh Venkatasubramanian
(Submitted on 14 Jun 2013)

Understanding Humans’ Strategies in Maze Solving
Min Zhao, Andre G. Marquez
(Submitted on 22 Jul 2013)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s